Rise and power base
Public roles are source-confirmed; controversies or allegations must be read separately as source-backed evidence-layer material.
Dhaka
An E-Orange leadership figure connected to the platform's advance-payment and non-delivery case record.
Aliases: Masukur Rahman, Masukur Rahman Suman, E-Orange former owner, E-Orange adviser/director
Included because reporting identifies him as Sonia Mehzabin's husband and an E-Orange owner/director in arrest and charge-framing reports.
0
Documented themes
1
Legal cases
0
Official findings
2
Verified sources
0
Organizations
1
Areas
0
Connected people
1
Incidents
Public roles are source-confirmed; controversies or allegations must be read separately as source-backed evidence-layer material.
Dhaka
Reported themes: e-commerce advance payments, customer complaints, arrest, and trial proceedings.
The public-interest value is understanding how power in state institutions, policing, media, urban governance, or finance is discussed in records.
The project records allegations, arrest/remand, and charge-framing separately; no final conviction is asserted in this profile.
Next steps should model each claim, case, court order, response, or correction as a separate structured record.
Financial scandal · 2020-01-01 2026-02-16
A record of E-Orange advance payments, non-delivery complaints, arrest/remand, and 2026 charge-framing reporting.
Explore incidentbdnews24.com · 16 Feb 2026
Bangla court report on charge framing and warrants against Sonia Mehzabin and Masukur Rahman Suman.
Reviewed
The Daily Star · 31 Aug 2021
Report on arrest/remand and detention of E-Orange former owners in a customer-embezzlement case.
Reviewed
bdnews24.com · 16 Feb 2026
Bangla court report says charges were framed and arrest warrants issued against Sonia Mehzabin, Masukur Rahman Suman, and others in an E-Orange fraud and embezzlement complaint.
The Daily Star · 31 Aug 2021
Report says former E-Orange owners Sonia Mehjabin and Masukur Rahman were sent to jail after remand in a customer-embezzlement case involving about Tk 1,100 crore.